Big Kids

When I was a kid, biking was my favorite activity (after drawing.)  Luckily I had a lot of space to do it.

Big Kids

When I started biking to work I hadn’t ridden a bike in 10-15 years. I’d never experienced biking for transportation. So it was not surprising that getting on a bike made me feel like a kid again… except I found myself biking in this:

Big Kids

It was anything but carefree. I realized pretty quick that I couldn’t bike like a kid and I had to pay attention. The city was an entirely different thing with potential for dangerous situations and the need to be careful.

However at least once a week I see someone do something careless like this:

Big Kids

Without even flinching or showing any awareness that they were almost killed. I just wanna say you guys SCARE THE SHIT OUT OF ME!

I’ve heard some brush it off and say they’re only putting themselves at risk. But, last time I checked, cities have more than one person. So when you do something careless like take a sudden left from the far right of the right lane…

Big Kids

You could set off a chain of events and put others at risk.  Nope, you can’t bike like a kid anymore.

Next Post
Previous Post

You may also like

33 comments

  • Ry April 27, 2012  

    Careless/Oblivious cyclists are one reason I’d rather ride on the road than on a bike path, cars on the whole seem to be more predicable or maybe I am just more attentive when I ride on the road….?

  • h4x354x0r April 28, 2012  

    As a business-class bicyclist who has displaced about 150,000 car miles in urban commuting so far, I can tell you a little consideration for the rest of the traffic goes a LONG way in terms of safety and respect from motorists. Don’t surprise them, and don’t take unfair advantage of traffic. If the same motorist ends up stuck behind you and has to slow down and then pass you more than once on a commute, you’re just pissing people off.

    Of course there are limits to this; no matter how “correctly” you ride, there are still jerks out there. And, in my experience, they all seem to be coming from, or going to, a Wal-Mart. My previous job’s 8Km (5mi) commute took me right by a Wal-Mart every day. 90% of the negative interactions I had were within a 1/2Km (1/4 mile) of that Wal-Mart. Since I changed jobs and don’t ride by a Wal-Mart anymore, it’s been years since I’ve had a problem with a motorist.

    Bicycles are unique and very hard to deal with from a traffic perspective, because they completely span speed ranges from pedestrian to in-town traffic, and everything in between. This is why most cyclists see themselves, and act, like pedestrians with an advantage, not as vehicles. And, it’s why no one type of infrastructure works for all cycling needs. The truth is, even riding like a flaming moron isn’t *that* dangerous. The speeds just aren’t that great, and sight and hearing are usually excellent. There are tons of stories about close calls, but few real incidences of collisions. That’s because bike speeds are generally low enough to give a little breathing room on reaction times.

    From my experience, I’d estimate it takes about 4 years of riding like a moron to reach a 100% probability of getting hurt. I live in a college town, and students can usually spend 4 years riding bikes like clueless jerks without getting hit by a car. If it were really that dangerous, there would be more collisions. There aren’t.

    But consider me: 30 years, 150,000 urban miles… If I rode like a clueless jerk, I’d be dead a half a dozen times over by now. I figured out very early on, once I committed to using a bike as transportation, that I had to respect the traffic, get along with the traffic, and work with the traffic. Sometimes I even feel a bit foolish waiting in traffic on my bike just like the cars, while other cyclists go zipping by me, weaving in and out of traffic, on and off sidewalks, and blowing through stop-signs and stoplights like they are pedestrians with the right-of-way. But… they might not be planning to use a bike for transportation for another 20-30 years. I am, and if I let my ‘good rider’ habits go slack, it would just be a matter of time before I got hurt.

    Respect drivers. Don’t surprise drivers. Work with the traffic. Almost all of us drive cars too; if you see a cyclist do something that irritates you or surprises you when you’re driving, don’t do it when you’re on a bike. It’s mostly just respect and common sense that makes cycling safe and successful.

    I’m living proof that it can be done.

  • Brian April 28, 2012  

    For that kind of clueless biking, Boston is by far the worst city I’ve ever seen. I’m not sure whether it can be blamed on the high concentration of college students, or if it’s just that the general standard of civility for all drivers on the road is pretty low. Philly has many of the same problems. NYC actually isn’t as bad. DC is, comparatively, a law-abiding Nordic state.

    • h4x354x0r April 28, 2012  

      I’m saying it’s almost everywhere (I’ve seen, anyway), and there’s a reason for it: Bicycles have one wheel rolling firmly in the pedestrian world. But also, one wheel rolling in the car world. This is why good solutions are so difficult: it’s actually a really complicated problem. I wish I had better answers; it seems like the best solutions are very location/situation specific.

    • dr2chase May 1, 2012  

      Don’t forget the infrastructure.

      Speaking as a less-law-abiding-than-I-once-was cyclist, I think the two big influences against orderly cycling are the informal attitude towards traffic laws by car drivers, and the sometimes boneheaded road/intersection design. 3/4 of the drivers roll through stop signs unless there is clear cross traffic, about 1/2 the drivers will not stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk unless some other car has stopped first, probably 4/5 speed in residential neighborhoods, and 9/10 speed on freeways.

      Bad infrastructure means things like 2-mile stretches of road (not limited access) lacking any crosswalks at all, and inconsistent sidewalks on the edges. Or, the two-lane rotaries at Concord and Fresh Pond (one lane rotaries are okay for bikes — and yes, there is a path around now). Or, the no-signs-no-signals intersection at Concord/Common/Leonard in Belmont (at the railroad bridge ). Cyclists routinely ride on the sidewalk (in a business district, in the presence of actual pedestrians) to avoid riding on that road. Those people who propose that rule-free shared space is safer, are nuts. I’ve seen it, and at least with the traffic mix in this country, it’s not fun even in a car, never mind on foot or bicycle.

      You see all this, and eventually you conclude that you have to break rules to avoid danger spots, and that most people don’t care about the rules anyway, and that the complainers are an ineffectual minority (because if they were effective, why, those laws would be enforced, and they’re not). And it’s plainly obvious that a rule-breaking driver is far more dangerous than a rule-breaking cyclist, so if they do it, why not us, too? And whether people are “surprised” — really, in Boston, you are surprised by what people do? A road near here, I’ve twice recently seen people drive the wrong direction on a rotary, because they didn’t want to have to go ALL THE WAY AROUND to take a left turn. I ride downhill through that rotary on my way home, hitting 20+mph, “surprised” in this case would mean “hurt quite a lot”.

      What made my commute much more tolerable, after a road was punched through in the office park, was realizing that if I made an illegal left turn from the Middlesex Tpk into the Barnes and Noble parking lot (jumping a curb in the process, then jumping another at the back of the lot), that my commute could be both less stressful and safer, because I don’t have to share space with speeding cars on a multilane road possibly right-hooking me on their way into the various malls (this is where most of my near-right-hooks have occurred).

      I am sure that something similar (law-breaking drivers) is at work in Philly. My brother lived there for a while, he thought that the signs saying “Wait For Green” pretty much said it all about how people drove in Philadelphia.

    • Ray May 10, 2012  

      I think it is a bad combination of both inexperienced college kids AND the general standard. The default is aggressive/assertive… playing chicken sort or – waiting for the other to flinch – you win! But if you play by those rules, you can still ride fairly safely.
      You do have to stick your chin out a bit too much… it takes a while to get used to.

  • Diane May 7, 2012  

    agree. there’s a place in singapore called east coast park where all the leisure cyclists go. i’ve been riding here a while now and the only time i’ve ever gotten in an accident was due to other cyclists at the said park who are seemingly oblivious to other moving vehicles in the area. 🙁

  • MikeD May 7, 2012  

    I found your site through a post in CTC, (a cycling organization in England). I love your pics. You KNOW what riding a bicycle in the real world is all about.

    I really like the second one down – the small female rider feeling so intimidated by a hostile traffic.

    I’d love to use your illustration to make up a Birthday card for someone, (changing the text to make it more relevant to both the person concerned and to where I live (England) but will not do so without your permission.

    I will of course, leave the pointer to your website.

    Lastly, regardless of your reply, please continue to draw for us cyclists. There’s not many producing artwork pertaining to cycling that consider the ‘ordinary’ man/woman fighting it out on the hostile streets when producing pics.

    Wish I could buy a large print to stick on my wall.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.